Followers who wish to change from readers

Sunday, 25 October 2026

Life, Courage and Meaning:


Life, Courage and Meaning

 Life,Courage and Meaning:

 

 ( What's love go to do with it?)

Life never guarantees happiness, but it does offer each of us meaning. 

Perhaps when we look after number one too much,we forgo the Happiness and Meaning of helping others find Happiness and Meaning. 

What do You think or feel?

Given that every life matters, including our own, we all attempt to preserve it.

Heroes give up their own right to life and attempt to save and preserve the right to life of others. We as a society, applaud the acts of heroism and rightly so. We reward courage, determination and risk-taking, whether in a war hero,a billionaire or stay at home Mum.

Likely you were surprised by the inclusion of a Mum in the above statement? Did this really seem unlikely? Did you honestly think that acts of heroism are limited to  war and conflict/risk in industry 🤔 ?

Ask yourself why you thought that way? Are the acts of heroism limited to the threats to life or the 'ordinary' acts of courage and selflessness in mundane life?

( Opinion )
at 25/10/26.

 By Digital Anvil
retrotimetunnel.blogspot.com
 

Overview Effect:

 Overview Effect:

 

The “overview effect” is well-documented, describing the overwhelming feelings experienced by astronauts at seeing the Earth suspended in the inky blackness of space.

 Space tourists feel it too, with William Shatner (of Star Trek fame) confessing to feeling grief during his 2021 space flight with Blue Origin. “I discovered that the beauty isn’t out there, it’s down here, with all of us”, he wrote later in his memoir. A sense of the Earth’s fragile splendour and its singular status as our only home compounds the remorse people feel at ecological destruction.

Such reactions aren’t necessarily religious. But the overview effect presses on dormant nerves — desensitised, say, by a pervasive scientism that claims that the scientific method is the only route to knowledge and truth. Further, people’s often spiritual reactions to seeing the Earth in its entirety are even more extraordinary, given that that extra-planetary perspective is only possible through incredible feats of scientific and technological advancement.

No wonder the overview effect prompts people to express the “I’m not religious, but …

 

Excerpt from CPX e-newsletter.

 

(From Digital Anvil )

Saturday, 24 October 2026

Post -Modern Feminism Claims and Objectives:

WHEN FEMINISM BECOMES THE VERY THING IT CLAIMS TO OPPOSE


Feminism achieved important victories for women: voting rights, property ownership, educational opportunities, workplace participation and legal equality. These achievements deserve recognition.


But parts of contemporary feminism have drifted far from those principles. In Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States, some influential strands of feminist activism have become increasingly ideological, intolerant, discriminatory and openly hostile towards men and boys.

It's time to challenge the double standards.

1. Misandry masquerading as empowerment. Casual contempt for men, collective accusations of misogyny, and slogans such as "men are trash" have become acceptable in some circles. Replace "men" with "women" and the prejudice becomes obvious. Sexism doesn't become virtuous when directed at males.

2. Demonising masculinity. Boys are increasingly exposed to narratives portraying masculinity as toxic, dangerous or inherently oppressive. Traditional masculine virtues (courage, strength, protectiveness, resilience and responsibility) deserve celebration, not suspicion. Boys need encouragement and positive role models, not collective guilt.

3. Institutionalised double standards. Governments enthusiastically fund women's advancement while serious male disadvantages in suicide, education, homelessness, workplace deaths and criminal justice receive inadequate attention. Equality institutions cannot credibly champion one sex while neglecting the other.

4. Ideology masquerading as science. Some gender research begins with patriarchy as the explanation and works backwards. Biological differences, evolutionary psychology and competing hypotheses are dismissed when inconvenient. The controversial "Man Box" framework exemplifies concerns about deficit-based interpretations of masculinity. Research should investigate reality, not manufacture ideological confirmation.

5. Abandoning boys in education. Boys lag in literacy and educational completion across much of the English-speaking world. Yet gender equity initiatives frequently remain overwhelmingly female-focused. Where is the urgency about boys falling behind?

6. Marginalising male victims. Domestic and sexual violence are too often framed through simplistic male-perpetrator/female-victim myths. Women experience serious and disproportionate harms in certain categories, but male victims and female perpetrators are also common. Every victim deserves recognition, protection and support.

7. Sacrificing due process. The excesses of "believe women" activism have sometimes encouraged institutions to treat accusations as convictions. Supporting complainants must never mean abandoning impartial investigations, procedural fairness or the rights of the accused.

8. Undermining fathers. Cultural assumptions that mothers are naturally superior parents have marginalised fathers, including after separation. Children benefit from the loving involvement of both biological parents. Fathers are not disposable accessories to family life.

9. Silencing dissent. Researchers, journalists and advocates who question feminist orthodoxies can face vilification, intimidation and professional pressure. Disagreement is not hatred. Intellectual freedom matters more than ideological conformity.

10. Turning equality into female preference. Quotas, preferential programmes and selective advocacy can transform equal opportunity into unequal treatment. Genuine fairness requires examining disadvantage, individual merit and proportionality; not automatically privileging one sex.

These problems do not characterise every feminist, nor does feminism explain every disadvantage facing males.

But a movement cannot claim the moral authority of equality while tolerating prejudice, selective compassion and institutional unfairness.

We need male-positive psychology, evidence-based policy, stronger families, equal justice and institutions accountable to everyone.

Women and girls deserve dignity, opportunity and protection.

So do men and boys.

Equality is not a female entitlement. It is a universal human principle.

#GenderEquality #MensRights #MalePsychology #BoysMatter #Fatherhood #EqualityForAll #MutualRespect

 

 
by Celebrating Masculinity:
  
(from Digital Anvil) 

Friday, 23 October 2026

Discernment:





Discernment - The Difference Between Right and Almost Right


Have you noticed that choosing what is right is often not very easy?

We tend to be surprised about this, but we shouldn't be. The problem is that we think the choice is between right and wrong. If only it were that easy.

Years ago the great English preacher C H Spurgeon said, "Discernment is not knowing the difference between right and wrong. It is knowing the difference between right and almost right."

The problem for us is that what ends up being wrong can look right, feel right and seem right, but be wrong.

It's why we need wise and trusted friends, and especially God's Word, to help us find the boundaries.

 

Share this daily -reading.


My particular thanks to Karl Faase.

( from Digital Anvil )

Wednesday, 21 October 2026

Big Sister ( to Big Brother ): 1984 in 2026:

BIG SISTER IS WATCHING YOU:

ORWELL’S 1984 COMES TO AUSTRALIA IN 2026


George Orwell warned us about a society where government controls information, monitors citizens, manipulates language and decides which ideas are acceptable.


Seventy-seven years after 1984 was published, Australia is heading in a deeply troubling direction.

Except our version of Big Brother would be called BIG SISTER.

Consider the extraordinary concentration of power exercised by Anika Wells, Michelle Rowland, Tanya Plibersek, Ged Kearney, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant and others across government.

Look at the direction of travel:


🔴 THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH: Labor attempted to legislate against “misinformation”. That bill failed, but the ambition to regulate online information continues.

🔴 THE THOUGHT POLICE: The proposed Digital Duty of Care regime would pressure platforms to anticipate and mitigate broadly defined harms. Who decides which opinions are harmful? Big Sister, of course.

🔴 BIG SISTER’S SECRET AGENTS: Proposed powers for eSafety to use fictitious online identities, including AI-generated material, raise disturbing questions about covert monitoring and accountability.

🔴 THE MEMORY HOLE: Content removal, algorithmic suppression and search restrictions can make inconvenient information disappear from public view.

🔴 THE TELESCREEN: Age verification, digital monitoring and compulsory information-gathering increasingly threaten the anonymity Australians once enjoyed online.

🔴 THE MINISTRY OF PROPAGANDA: The ABC and SBS receive billions in public funding, while Labor is expanding subsidies for commercial journalism. How independent can our information ecosystem remain when government increasingly finances it?

🔴 NEWSPEAK AND DOUBLETHINK: Censorship becomes “safety”. Monitoring becomes “protection”. Restrictions become “duty of care”. Ideological conformity becomes “inclusion”. And questioning government-approved narratives risks being labelled “harmful”.

Here is the fundamental transformation:

Australia is moving from regulating specific unlawful online acts toward regulating the CONDITIONS under which information is made available, recommended, encountered and assessed for potential harm...

The information-control architecture is being transformed from punishing unlawful acts toward proactively managing the information environment, using regulatory powers, financial incentives, technological monitoring and ever-expanding definitions of harm.

That's an extraordinary shift in power from citizens to the state. And Big Sister wants to take us there.

Australia is not yet Orwell's Oceania. We retain elections, independent courts and the freedom to challenge government.

But the direction of travel is unmistakably concerning...

The danger isn't merely what today's politicians intend. It's the machinery of information control they're building for tomorrow's governments.

Freedom isn't something that governments generously grant us. It is something citizens must defend against government overreach.

Orwell wrote 1984 as a WARNING.

Australia must not turn it into an instruction manual.


#1984 #GeorgeOrwell #BigSister #FreeSpeech #Censorship #Australia #eSafety #CivilLiberties

 

by Unnamed Contributor. 

 

(from Digital Anvil ) 

Tuesday, 20 October 2026

Always do a Good Job:


Always do a Good Job



“The Lord God put the man in the garden of Eden to care for it and work it.” Genesis 2:15 NCV

 

The first thing God did when He made Adam was put him to work. That’s because work gives us a sense of purpose, meaning, and dignity. “God put the man in the garden…to…work it.” So Adam was a gardener.


But whether you count cash in a bank, trade on the stock market, flip burgers at a takeaway shop, whip up pasta specials at a five-star restaurant, fell giant timber in the forest, or split and deliver firewood, coach a team, pastor a congregation, publish bestselling books, deliver newspapers in the early morning hours, star in your own television show, farm a large acreage, mow and edge neighbourhood lawns, go out on the road as a salesperson for computers, drive a truck loaded with machinery, build homes, clean swimming pools, argue cases before a judge, or settle family disputes as a counsellor, always do a good job. 

A wise man once said: “Every job is a self-portrait of the person who does it. Autograph your work with excellence.” The biblical character Daniel did that. And like cream, he rose to the top in Babylon. “Daniel was preferred above the presidents and princes, because an excellent spirit was in him” (Daniel 6:3 KJV). No task is insignificant when doing it faithfully for the Lord. 
 
The Bible says: “Lazy people want much but get little, but those who work hard will prosper” (Proverbs 13:4 NLT). So always do a good job.

SoulFood: 1 Cor 1–3 Mark 14:53–65 Ps 34:1–10 Pro 

My Appreciation for and to Vision.org.au

For more excellent readings, please visit Vision.org.au

( from Digital Anvil )

Life, Courage and Meaning:

Life, Courage and Meaning  Life,Courage and Meaning:    ( What's ...