Talk to some librarians and they'll seem neutrally helpful, yet their own beliefs are subtly dispensed. Some acknowledge their own worldview,so are truthful about it. While others attempt to hide their influences by guile. Therefore trampling fairness without relief.
How should we treat the unfairness of their troubled worldview? Say nought?
Pressure is bought to bear.
But defining intent can be a slippery slope.
While words are voiced concepts of the mind defining and revealing motive can be difficult indeed.
However we acknowledge that our sensibilities of their words of their earnest worldview comes from their core.
How can we apportion blame,hidden values or devious motive? A linguistic scientist I am not. Or clever detective I'm just a person who observes and who has a platform for my thoughts.
Are they ignorantly so or is it their aim to subvert? Should we expose them or do we find common ground?
Thankfully there are those whose manner or nature is to ennoble and to nuture. To enable a person to reach fulfillment,security and stability. If the individual is struggling, then the likelihood is that the family is struggling,so too the local community may struggle, in turn the wider society making it possible that the nation may struggle. Sounds farfetched? The ripple affect or dominoes fall one by one. How do we demonstrate the riches of a free society whose goals and ambitions aren't just in our lifetime ( in the here and now) but with a view to forever? The portal of Eternity!
(Opinion by Digital Anvil)
No comments:
Post a Comment