Followers who wish to change from readers

Sunday, 10 August 2025

American [Brand of] Marxism [continues]

 

 American Marxism [ continues]

 

 Class Struggle vs Individual Free Will?

 

A prolific writer and prominent advocate of Marxism  was John Dewey. (1859-1952) His role in drastically altering the traditional purposes of education into a social activism movement is manifest throughout education today.


 Dewey acknowledged and approved of Marxism's influence on, and relationship to, the progressive movement: 

"[T|he issue which [Marx] raised-the relation the economic structure to political- -is one that actively persists.

 Indeed, it forms the only basis of present political question... We are in for some kind of socialism, call it by whatever name you may  please, and no matter what it will be called when it is related is "Economic determinism," [Marx's theory of economic class struggle between, among others, the capitalist and the proletariat| now  a fact, not a theory. But there is a difference and a choice beneath a blind, chaotic and unplanned determinism, issuing from business conducted for pecuniary profit, and the determination socially planned and ordered development":

" It is the difference and the choice between a socialism that is public and one that is capitalistic."

 But there is no "economic determinism" when individuals are free to pursue their own goals and dreams. Economic struggle  is the false label given to hard work,competition, Free Will,personal motivation, responsibility and life lessons and hacks and the satisfaction of individual needs and desires, the creation and pursuit of  opportunities with accountability..etc. 

All of the above can be summarised as the fulfillment of individual desires and manifest complexities of each and every human being.

Excerpt from the Book, American Marxism by Mark E Levin.


( Opinion and research by Digital Anvil)

Saturday, 9 August 2025

American [Brand of] Marxism:( Re-Work)

 

American Marxism 

 

Individual Opportunity vs  Greater Good?

 
 
 
Of course the ideas of capitalism are an enterprising example of economic opportunities for all. Practical unrestricted economic opportunities for all. But only for the greater good of the community.
 
 
"This is the core of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx--that is, the individual must sacrifice his independence, free Will and personal pursuits to the greater good, and in that way only will he become more fulfilled and self-realised, but the entire communitv will benefit as well."

 

" In America. capitalism and constitutionalism are ramparts that stand against Marxism and progressivism and, therefore, must be discredited and Ultimately demolished. For the progressive, like the Marxist, economic and political power must be in the same hands, the hands of a relative few in charge of the state."

 

"However, much groundwork must be done to create broader acquiescence or acceptance to this alien transformation, where the philosopher /kings and intellectual masterminds disassemble and, thereafter, remake society. The solution: indoctrinate "the masses," who have been raised to respect and revere the idealised tradition, custom, faith, and patriotism, to abandon the their supposedly obsolete beliefs for a promise of an organised, collective Utopia."
 
 
 
"Change the people to accommodate and eventually support an autocratic government ( The people ruled willingly by a smaller group of persons -elites ) that can allegedly manage their lives better than they can."
 
 
This state of play means that all invention and innovation becomes "property" of the State  whereby entrepreneurs and their start-ups are directed by the fewer but more cognisant of the" greater good " concepts and  elite-concentration of economic,cultural, social and political power.
 
When the means of production:capital,labour and other resources are combined,the State ( large Govt) claim and wield all necessary power, all aimed at the "greater good " the individual is swallowed up in the Utopian ideal.
 Individualism is extolled but only for or as the means to the "greater good" end. The State becomes the de facto father and mother in a similar oligarchical fashion to National Socialism ( Nazism ) and Fascism. Rebranding these political institutions as Social Democracy and Techno-feudalism. Whatever name or brand they go by, essentially  they are culturally Marxist or business/ communism. 

Excerpt from the Book: American Marxism by Mark Levin.
(NB: Opinion  and research by Digital Anvil)
 
 
For further research, see 
 

Prager U for more institutional learning and  tertiary education 

Thursday, 7 August 2025

Serial Encounter Or Journey into Light; When does thinking something end or begin it ?

 

 Serial Encounter Or Journey into Light:

 

When does thinking something end or begin it? 

 

Some people actually believe that not talking about a particular narrative or conversation means that that particular topic has no influence or impact on them. This is some of the thinking behind the narrative of the left-leaning netizen 🤔. By not discussing it, one's life is not affected. By discussing it means that it is real and present danger.


This situation is a variant or semi- analogous to burying your head in the sand like an ostrich.The danger is still present but one cannot see it or acknowledge it.

Although one doesn't think that way or lead a conversation in that direction doesn't mean that that particular stream of thought hadn't impacted your behaviour or morphed your belief -system. Or isn't present in one's thinking. 

Believe it magical or not is the title of a broader infoscape on mysterious occurrences, strange events and inexplicable things not encountered in everyday life.But now shapes the views of many.

Believe- it- magical- or -not kind of thinking has also infiltrated some churches in the past decades. Many,unfortunately, teach that thinking casually or acknowledging sin only makes it worse and causes one to sin in the first place.

Of course this is Not what the Bible teaches. Sin is indulged in because we are all sinners.  We are not sinners because we sin, we sin because we are sinners from the beginning.

Some modern churches teach or else tend to promote that men, the masculine spirit, is the underlying cause for iniquity,sinning and existential problems that plague our global lives.

So much so that often some women inside and outside the church espouse the kind of belief that men are to blame for everything that is toxic in society and western societies in particular. 

Women, of course, don't sin- at all. It's all men's fault- they're bad.

But GOD.

The Bible helps us to collect and approach our thoughts and belief systems within as dispassionately yet authentically as possible. But being human,our hearts deceive us utterly and completely. Fiercely we fall under the sway of our greatest enemy- ourselves.

So we need someone or some being who can unravel the complexity of the ordinary heart. Dangerous as it is. 
To examine ourselves- in particular and each other, so that falsehoods, half-truths and outright lies don't sway us and our nations into destruction. 

Unfortunately,  surveillance societies make possible mass control of people and their beliefs in ways somehow foreseen by visionaries like Aldous Huxley and George Orwell. Alerting us to the dangers of secretive and overt authoritarian political  and cultural control. Kindly but strong rulers rarely exist and  that mean that the presence of evil affects us (even globally) today?

While it seems to us that the world is at peace,such peace is a false perception. Our world is at war with itself. Peace is the rarity,not the common state of being.
 
 Everywhere are the footprints and fingerprints of good, even in nations sullied by evil.
 

 

Of  course there are people out there who have gone before and concluded the very same problem(s) i have.  I am uncertain of my conclusions.  But doubts to the contrary doesn't mean we are wrong.Nor entirely correct either?
 
 Specific to universal truths are here, open your eyes  
 
A thorny issue, indeed?  What do you think? Agree or comment ?
 

Until next time. 

( Opinion by Digital Anvil)

Tuesday, 5 August 2025

Nuance is Needed:

 

 Nuance Is Needed

 

 German isn't Nazi ?

 President Trump isn't Nazi?

Israeli Defence Force  isn't Nazi?

Hitler was a nasty,evil Nazi.

 

On 27 July 1945, a funeral was held in an Anglican Church in Brompton, London. This was just after the Second World War, when Winston Churchill had led the English in resisting the force of the Nazis.


Churchill made it clear that Germany was the enemy and England had to stand together to defeat the German army. Imagine what the people of London felt when they heard that the funeral in the Brompton Church was for a German.

The funeral was for Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German Lutheran minister, who stood up against Hitler and was executed in a German prison.

What the English needed to grasp was that not all Germans were evil; nuance was needed in their response.

Over half a century has passed, and nothing has changed. We should never judge an individual, a race or a group by the murderous actions of a few.

Thanks for this daily-reading from Daily Nudge. 

Saturday, 2 August 2025

Glorify,the App

 

 Glorify, the App

 

Glorify has helped me create a daily habit of connecting with God, I thought you might be interested in checking it out: 


P.U.S.H the link to rescue


Tap or click the above for more.

(Commendable Briefing with thanks)

Friday, 1 August 2025

Specific to Universal Truth (Quote)

Quote: Specific to Universal Truth.


On Stage 5 of the 2004 Tour de France, a breakaway group got out in front of the race, and a then-young Thomas Voeckler won the stage and the opportunity to wear the yellow jersey. In the tour, the race leader wears the yellow jersey – it’s enormously prestigious in world cycling.

Voeckler, wearing the yellow jersey, walked past the previous holder and the controversial cyclist Lance Armstrong and said, "Don’t worry, I am only borrowing it". In a surprisingly humble moment, Armstrong replied, "We are all only borrowing it".

Whatever position of leadership or responsibility you hold in public office or a private company, it’s helpful to remember you are only borrowing it.

You don’t own it, and it doesn’t define you.

We all only borrow our lives. It"s God who defines. 

( With thanks to Daily Nudge:Daily-reading)

Later Secular and Christian Thought: ( Re-Work)

 Later Century Secular and Christian Thought:(Re-Work)

 

Where has balance gone 

Truth paused, then liberated?

It's not what you think? Or is It?

 

 
The modern era have seen the current age of vast prosperity with the advances in medicine,technology,science,war,agricultural,material science,literacy and numeracy for all, home/office work, libraries, cheaper- travel, rise of feminism,relative ageism, cancel culture, right and left- wing buffoonery, euthanasia,transactional -love, auto and alternative-sexuality,  neo- politics and rise in longevity and uplift of rationalism,return of nationalism and alternative theories such as critical race theory, toxic  and anti - traditional masculinity,female re-valuation  and gender theory spread

The pervasive spread of basic and essential knowledge and reform of Order-Law protocols and traditional customs within some kinds of opposing world views have released  the masses from relative slavery. With the democratisation of knowledge and virtually instant communication anywhere and anytime  achieved. This has ushered in a new Cultural and Political Age. Of  course the Hi- Tech Age accompanied the overall dominance of the West. But such prosperity  though fairly common was not fully long-term and not trickled down everywhere. ( as is slower  developing Asian nations,African countries and Latin world nations )
 
Overall the rise of western Feminism has achieved the aim of liberation of the second sex globally. Some say the pendulum has swung way too far to the other extreme. Given the rise of double income families, whole societies rose boldly with nations accruing global significance and a kind of first-among-equals status. 
Individualism ousted community core- values, but the pendulum swung back after some decades in seemingly,open desperation.  That resulted in a truce of sorts. Leading to the prominence of the far-left culture and political movements known today.

Hi- Technologies became popular and strident almost overnight.  A new kind of power emerged, the power of the bit,satellite and fibre-optic cable. Previously when  new technology broke through elites kept the advantage for decades, even centuries. However more recently,  when the next-best -thing occurred,  mass production swung into action instead. The masses obtained the advantage quickly. Elites seeking to re-establish their ascendancy, fought back with the culture wars as they became known. But undeterred, forces for good, were not far behind.

While creating a vast pool of skilled and highly advanced workforce with the globalisation of resources and highly- skilled nomadic workforce  World wide prosperity ensured the success of the ordinary citizen. Again forces of darkness fought to topple the neo- economic structure. Newer conservative voices, vilogs, blogs and podcasts and the coffee set social media found reception among the Gen Z population and Gen Y. The surge in the popularity of ancient philosophy and the rise of Western pro-Christianity movements are well documented in recent surveys. 

But is it too late?
 
The rise of Western pro- democratic civilization broadening and distributing richer urban  life -styles and  with unfortunately its attendant ills. While uplifting humanity as a whole it has created the opposite effect simultaneously. 

With some very interesting, intellectual complexities and nuances of philosophical thought widely available to the connected citizen. This situation has given rise towards wider chaos with the nature similar to the opposite circumstances where most people in the distant past  had little or no knowledge causing a chain of events whereby only a few mortals and their families ruled the ignorant masses. Too much knowledge isn't a good thing.either. In post- modern times there is such diversity  of thought most people's world-views clash without even meaning to.

The 20th and 21st centuries saw the world rise from significant overall poverty into a burgeoning vast sector of middle income earners whose lives,attitudes and aims directed Governments and populations into trying other political persuasions  like Techno-Fascism and Islamic- Communism.With competing and sometimes opposing economic pressures and forces the developed world turned into enclaves of separate economic and geopolitical regions.

 Some Western governments sought prosperity for all mankind like the US Marshall plan after the second W.War, while others sought consolidation of elitist ruling classes intolerantly  resetting the world into a potential one world government rule. The ruling classes have tried to control the narrative whereby competing voices which are censored and are labelled as misinformation and disinformation to quash the alternative views and practices. 

These modern  concepts are exposed by secular books such as 1984, Brave New World ,Animal Farm and the like!

With the advent of techno- utopianism and the installation of robotic manufacturing with augmented artificial intelligence, the Hi- tech sector has become a new kind of de-facto Overlord or King -maker and with the growth of a surveillance society making possible mass control of national populations. With social media platforms catapulting other and legitimising alternative political theories into global prominence.

They enable a new kind of economic and political control not attainable until the advent of the computer,  digital economy with the ubiquitous internet and artificial intelligence ,bio- metric and facial recognition CCTV. 


This  growth of science, technology and hyper-rational atheism as a result. religion or spirituality has at times seemed to be under threat from relativism,atheism and nihilism.. So it is not surprising that some of the most interesting twentieth-century writings on Christianity are those that consider the underpinning of religion in the modern world  The first book in this section: The Way of the Pilgrim something of a return to a simpler age. The pilgrim's faith in God is inspiring and a reminder of simpler times. However, it is a book that examines some of the most basic aspects of faith, and tries to establish an understanding of what it means to live a life devoted to God.

 

The other books mentioned here are all from the twentieth and twenty-first century, and all address the basic problems of faith in the modern world. Ortbodoxy by G.K. Chesterton is an interesting book because it makes an argument that you don't see too often, which is that we should defer to the  authority of the Catholic Church.
Writers, even spiritual writers tend to be individualists.So they are perhaps less likely than other people to wish to make the argument that we show conformity to orthodoxy, but Chesterton makes an engaging argument for this point of view.

The Screwtape Letters is an original yet modern satirical view of the world of Hell and its demons. Its uniquely designer world of a major demon guiding a neophyte demon  is both humorous and startling. Since it's unlikely that demons carry pitchforks and have horns, Lewis' visualisation of demons like Madison Avenue masculine- types is both charming and devilish. Mad men into mad demons. Mad fiction into Mad fact?
This book and others address the problems of faith and temptation, . The works of Francis Schaeffer and Henry Nouwen each take a look at the essential roots of Christian faith, Meanwhile Timothy Keller's 2008 book The Reason for God returns to the true tradition of Christian apologetics. Keller looks at the arguments for scepticism and for rejecting Christianity and calmly debunks the certainty of the non-Christian position.
 
These titles are all ones that have their inestimable value in an age when doubt,loneliness and scepticism reign. It could perhaps be said that the two great dangers of the  post-modern world are  ignoring religious movements altogether and the atheistic forces of nihilism, pop-psychology,pop-culture, pragmatism, determinism, existentialism and faithlessness. The task facing the modern believer is how to steer a reasonable but intuitive path between these extremes.

( Opinion and research by Digital Anvil)


 
 

It's True!

Have you looked into the person who gave his life that others may be given the opportunity to love and live eternally? Jesus,the Son of God...